home writer designer
 

A REVIEW OF

Much Depends on Dinner:
The Extraordinary History and Mythology, Allure and Obsessions, Perils and Taboos, of an Ordinary Meal
By Margaret Visser, McClelland & Stewart, 1986

     Most people will salivate just from watching someone else sucking on a lemon, but introverts salivate more in response to lemon juice than extroverts do. And speaking of spittle, natives of Peru produce a beer called chicha by chewing corn kernels, expectorating, and then allowing the maltose and glucose captured in their saliva to ferment. These are among the hundreds of food facts in Margaret Visser's endlessly entertaining book Much Depends On Dinner; some passages may whet your appetite, while others will perhaps turn your stomach.
Visser remarks that boredom is a pervasive disease in our culture, and she feels that we are bored because we have lost sight of our connections to our world and our history. Her book, she says, "is a modest plea for the realization that absolutely nothing is intrinsically boring, least of all the everyday, ordinary things." And so she concocts a simple everyday meal, and then serves up 350 pages worth of fascinating information about the nine foodstuffs on her menu.
For the record, her menu is buttered corn with salt, chicken with rice, lettuce with olive oil and lemon juice, and ice cream. This meal, like our polyglot culture, is not indigenous to any region or climate of the earth, and certainly not to Canada. To some philosophers of food, such an anomaly would rank as the foremost topic of discussion, but Visser is not on a crusade to change our diets, though she would like us to be more aware of the things we eat and how we have come to eat them.
She is consistently illuminating in describing the mix of luck, ingenuity, and centuries of hard work it took us to develop our staple foods. Her expositions of plant genetics and agricultural techniques can be enjoyed by anyone interested in the contents of their supper plate. Beyond that, the book is a well-written but loosely organized collection of miscellany. We learn about labour relations in California lettuce fields and packing plants, but not about the politics of olive-picking, though we are treated to a long discussion of the annointing of monarchs with olive oil. Visser enters the animal rights controversy with a description of conditions in modern poultry factories, but says nothing about the way modern dairies handle the cows who give us our butter and ice cream. On nutrition, too, there are gaps: there is little mention of the role of refined sugar in the Western diet, though sugar is a principal ingredient of the ice cream we eat for dessert.
But as Visser quite rightly remarks in her introduction, it would be easy to write a whole book on each of the foods she discusses, and thoroughness would require her to greatly limit the scope of the book. To her credit, even her lengthy digressions often cast light on her more central concerns. Her chapter on corn, for instance, has little to say about sweet corn, the first item on her menu, because on a world scale sweet corn is a minor crop. Instead, we learn about cultures which rely on corn as a daily staple, while our society uses corn mostly as food for farm animals, thereby consuming much more of the golden grain then we could possibly ingest directly. Similarly, her concluding chapter on ice cream provides an occasion to examine the surprisingly short history of the use of cold to preserve meat, dairy products and vegetables.
The anthropology of everyday life, as Visser terms her work, is relatively unexplored terrain. Certainly few writers have offered us so much information about our primary needs in such a palatable form. Her book may raise as many questions as it answers, but that is the point of the recipe -- to get us to question the things we usually take for granted.

This review was published in the Globe & Mail, October 25, 1986

| top |

A REVIEW OF

Smoking: The Artificial Passion
by David Krogh, W.H. Freeman, 1991

 

A smoker savours a long, slow cigarette while a beautiful sunset marks the end of a busy day. A smoker scrounges a stale butt for an acrid inhalation on a bleak morning. How can the same habit be one of life's simple pleasures one day, and a messy and protracted method of suicide the next?
Those of us who have been wedded to the weed have often asked ourselves such questions, usually without answers. Now science writer David Krogh comes to our aid with an in-depth but still breezy look at the physiology of tobacco addiction.
Why do people smoke? To non-smokers, it is hard to figure out why anyone would choose to inhale tar and nicotine every half hour or so. Long-time smokers are often just as mystified by their own habit. Smokers who attempt to explain tobacco's attraction will offer two apparently contradictory answers. "It calms me down," they will say, and, "It picks me up."
Drawing on the by-now voluminous scientific literature, Krogh explains that tobacco is indeed both a tranquilizer and a stimulant. In fact, tobacco is the great moderator of moods. When the smoker is nervous or agitated a cigarette will have a clinically measurable calming effect. If the smoker is bored and tired, a cigarette will raise the pulse and increase mental acuity.
One thing a cigarette won't do, Krogh notes, is cause euphoria the way other widely used addictive drugs do. In fact, even a naturally induced euphoria -- the afterglow of sex, or a good meal -- will increase the desire for a cigarette, as the smoker unconsciously tries to moderate an "extreme" state of happiness. This is why for the struggling ex-smoker, both very good and very bad times present a special danger of relapse. This is also why, in contrast to "recreational" drugs like cocaine or marijuana, tobacco is used most often during working hours.
Krogh speculates that "nicotine remained legal while other drugs were brought under state control, mostly because nicotine allowed people to work, while other drugs attenuated their labouring abilities." But by looking at unusual situations, during times of war or in prison camps, he sees ample evidence that the craving for a cigarette can spur desperate behaviour.
Thus in spite of the human suffering that prompted him to ask, "Why do people smoke?" Krogh has no illusion that the law can solve this problem. "Were tobacco illegal," he concludes, "we would see with it all the depraved trappings of drug culture that we associate with 'serious' drugs like heroin or cocaine."
Education about the effects of tobacco, however, has had a dramatic effect on tobacco consumption in North America over the past few decades. Krogh's book, which for all the deadly seriousness of its topic is lively and entertaining, can play a valuable role both in helping smokers to quit and in helping non-smokers understand the habit.

This review was published in the Globe & Mail, November 2, 1991.

| top |